How Common Is It For A Tattoo To Get Infected
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 October; 113(twoscore): 665–671.
Original Article
The Adventure of Bacterial Infection After Tattooing
A Systematic Review of the Literature
Ralf Dieckmann
iGerman language Federal Institute for Risk Cess (BfR), Department of Biological Safety, Berlin
Ides Boone
1German Federal Institute for Chance Assessment (BfR), Department of Biological Safety, Berlin
Stefan O. Brockmann
2Regional Public Health Function, Department for Infection Control, Reutlingen
Jens A. Hammerl
1German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Biological Safety, Berlin
Annette Kolb-Mäurer
3University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Würzburg:
Matthias Goebeler
3University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Würzburg:
Andreas Luch
4German Federal Plant for Hazard Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Condom, Berlin
Sascha Al Dahouk
1German language Federal Found for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Biological Safety, Berlin
5RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Clinic for Gastroenterology, Metabolic Disorders and Internal Intensive Medicine (Medical Clinic 3), Aachen
Received 2015 Dec ii; Accepted 2016 Jun viii.
Abstract
Background
Tattooing is a globally growing trend. Overall prevalence among adults in industrialized countries is around x–20%. Given the loftier and increasing numbers of tattooed people worldwide, medical and public health implications emerging from tattooing trends require greater attention not only by the public, but also by medical professionals and wellness policy makers.
Methods
We performed a systematic review of the literature on tattoo-associated bacterial infections and bacterial contamination of tattoo inks. Furthermore, nosotros surveyed tattoo inks sampled during an international tattoo convention in Germany to study their microbial status.
Results
Our systematic review identified 67 cases published between 1984 and 2015, mainly documenting serious bacterial infectious complications afterward intradermal deposition of tattoo inks. Both local pare infections (due east.thousand. abscesses, necrotizing fasciitis) and systemic infections (e.chiliad. endocarditis, septic shock) were reported. Published bacteriological surveys showed that opened too equally unopened tattoo ink bottles frequently contained clinically relevant levels of bacteria indicating that the manufactured tattoo product itself may be a source of infection. In our bacteriological survey, ii of 39 colorants were contaminated with aerobic mesophilic bacteria.
Conclusions
Inappropriate hygiene measures in tattoo parlors and not-medical wound care are major risk factors for tattoo-related infections. In add-on, facultative pathogenic bacterial species tin can be isolated from tattoo inks in utilize, which may pose a serious health risk.
Body modifications including tattoos are a globally growing trend. According to recent surveys the overall prevalence of tattoos amongst adults in industrialized countries is around 10–20% (1). Since there are currently no public wellness reporting requirements for infectious complications associated with tattooing, the actual incidence and prevalence of infections post-obit tattooing remain largely unknown in many countries, which is why scientifically sound risk quantification is not possible.
In compliance with the International Classification of Procedures in Medicine (ICPM) tattooing represents a surgical procedure with its own Operations and Procedures (OPS) lawmaking number (5–890.0; encounter OPS version 2015). However, tattooing is well-nigh never performed by medical doctors and can therefore not exist epidemiologically monitored by utilise of medical databases.
A specific diagnosis lawmaking for diseases following non-medically indicated cosmetic surgery was introduced in Germany in 2008. However, this comprises diverse procedures such equally a range of aesthetic operations, along with tattoos and piercings. Since at that place is currently no ICD (International Nomenclature of Diseases) lawmaking that would explicitly and specifically associate infectious diseases with the procedure of tattooing, it proved impossible to derive a reliable estimate of infection rates from data collected past German language health insurance companies. Based on published surveys, between 0.5% and 6% of the people with a tattoo experienced infectious complications later on being tattooed (2– 6).
Considering the increasing numbers of tattooed people, tattooing may thus represent a significant public health risk (vii, viii). Therefore, physicians should be aware of atypical clinical presentations of tattoo-related infections that may lead to rare merely astringent adverse outcomes. Tattooing results in traumatization of the skin that may facilitate microbial pathogens to pass the epidermal bulwark causing local peel infections. In about cases such mild-to-moderate superficial skin infections remain unreported since they are cocky-limiting or easily treated with proper aftercare, local disinfection measures and/or antibiotic therapy. However, equally tattoo needles punch through the epidermis, thereby coming into contact with claret and lymph vessels in the dermal layer, bacteria may crusade systemic infections by inbound the claret stream. The severity of infection depends on the virulence of the pathogen, the immune status of the person existence tattooed and underlying diseases.
To assess hazards and disease outcomes related to bacterial infections as a consequence of tattooing, a systematic review of the literature and bacteriological investigation of inks was performed.
Methods
Literature survey
We conducted an electronic literature search in MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, BIOSIS Previews, EMBASE and Google Scholar for eligible studies addressing
-
bacterial infections, non related to mycobacteria, associated with a recent tattoo, and
-
tattoo inks contaminated with bacteria other than mycobacteria.
A flow chart of the selection procedure is presented in the Figure
Literature search: Clinical studies likewise every bit case reports on bacterial infections following tattooing and microbiological studies on the bacterial contamination of tattoo ink were included.
eBox 1 for a detailed description of the methodology).
Microbiological analysis
A full of 39 samples of tattoo inks originating from opened vials that were randomly collected by local health inspectors during the 10th International Tattoo Convention in Reutlingen, Frg, were analyzed. Enumeration and detection of aerobic mesophilic bacteria (i.eastward., aerobic bacteria that grow best at moderate temperatures) were performed in accord with validated guidelines for the microbiological analysis of cosmetic products (EN ISO 21149:2009), as was the detection of specified and not-specified microorganisms including Escherichia (E.) coli, Pseudomonas (P.) aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus (S.) aureus (EN ISO 18415:2011). Isolates from contaminated samples were sub-cultured for further identification by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-ToF MS) and 16S rRNA cistron sequencing.
Results
Tattoo-related infections
Our initial literature search yielded 1379 records, of which 1345 were excluded, mainly considering they described non-infectious cases, non-bacterial infections, non-clinical studies or were summary reports of already considered cases (Figure). 2 systematic reviews of tattoo-associated skin infections acquired past non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) were published quite recently (9, x). Since our survey revealed merely 4 additional reports describing six new cases (e1– e4), mycobacterial infections were excluded from our data assay and interpretation because of a lack of novelty.
We identified 67 cases of non-mycobacterial infections reported in 27 publications published between 1984 and 2015 (xi– 37), mainly documenting serious bacterial infectious complications after intradermal deposition of tattoo inks (Table one, eTable). Since the CDC case series (sixteen) presented just aggregated data, those 34 cases were omitted from the statistical analysis and discussed separately. Virtually patients were male (75%). The mean historic period was 28 years (range: 0–48 years). Most cases were reported from the The states (n=12), Europe (n=11) and New Zealand (n=v). The number of reports increased over fourth dimension and nine out of eleven cases from Europe and 10 out of 13 cases from North America were published between 2011 and 2015, which might indicate an increased awareness. South. aureus was reported as an etiological agent in 81% of the cases. Long-term antibiotic therapy with a mean duration of half dozen weeks (range 1–15 weeks) was the handling of option in 21 reports, which provided this blazon of information. Two patients died due to complications related to their infections (11, 15).
Table i
Local skin infections, systemic complications and etiological agents extracted from reported cases of tattoo-related, non-mycobacterial infections*
| Local skin infections (reference) | Leaner isolated from wound swab or abscess drainage (reference) |
|
|
| Systemic complications (reference) | Bacteria isolated from claret, tissue, wound swab and/or abscess drainage (reference) |
|
|
*run across the eTable for more detailed information; MSSA, methicillin-sensitive S. aureus; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Southward. aureus
eTable
Reported cases of tattoo-related, non-mycobacterial infections
| Manifestations at primary infection site (tattoo) | Secondary infection complications, (concomitant pre-existing atmospheric condition supporting bacterial infections) | Number of cases*, patient's state of origin | Age (years), sex (chiliad/f) | Organisms identified (Source) | Incubation period (days) | Likely cause of infection, transmission route | Effect | Reference |
| Local skin infections | ||||||||
| Peel and soft tissue infection | 1, United States of America | 45, k | MRSA (WS) | NA | Improper sanitary conditions: sharing needles and tattoo paraphernalia at a correctional facility | NA | Stemper et al. (2006) (17) | |
| Abscess | 3, Us of America | eighteen, f | MRSA (WS, abscess drainage) | NA | Unhygienic conditions | Fully recovered afterwards 8 weeks | Coulson (2012) (22) | |
| Abscess, tissue necrosis | (drug detoxification) | 22, f | MRSA (WS, abscess drainage) | NA | NA | Fully recovered after half-dozen weeks | ||
| Multiple abscesses, cellulitis | 37, m | MSSA, South. pyogenes (WS, abscess drainage) | 7 | Potential ink contamination | Hospitalization, fully recovered after four weeks | |||
| Cutaneous diphtheria, cellulitis | ane, New Zealand | Adult, yard | Toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae var. gravis, South. aureus (WS) | inside days | Traditional Samoan tattooing | Hospitalization, fully recovered within 1 calendar week | Sears et al. (2012) (23), McGouran et al. (2012) (24) | |
| Abscess | i, Germany | 31, g | MRSA (WS, abscess drainage) | NA | NA | NA | Wollina (2012) (25) | |
| Abscesses | 4, French republic | 29–43, m | MSSA (WS) | <21 | Tattooing or body shaving with mechanical razors | NA | Bourigault et al. (2014) (30) | |
| Abscess | ane, Spain | 32, m | Due south. marcescens (WS, abscess drainage) | xxx | NA | Hospitalization, fully recovered after 15 weeks | Diranzo-Garcia et al. (2015) (34) | |
| Erythema, pustules | i, Italy | 31, f | P. aeruginosa (WS) | 2 | Possible use of non-sterile tattooing technique or contamination of the ink | Recovery subsequently 2 weeks | Maloberti et al. (2015) (36) | |
| Erythema | Lyell'south syndrome (staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome; SSSS) | 1, Denmark | 48, m | Due south. aureus (WS) | NA | Home kit tattoo ink imported via the cyberspace, probable phototoxic reaction to the ink followed by a suspension in the skin barrier due to itching resulting in bacterial infection | Hospitalization, recovery later 1 week (followed by a six months treatment against allergic contact dermatitis reaction) | Mikkelsen et al. (2015) (37) |
| Systemic complications | ||||||||
| Purulent wound infection | Septicemia | 1, Nigeria | Newborn, NA | P. aeruginosa (BC, WS, pus) | 1 | Tribal tattooing under unhygienic weather | Hospitalization, death | Mathur and Sahoo (1984) (11) |
| Cellulitis and fasciitis, subcutaneous abscess | Polymicrobial septicemia | i, Australia | 25, chiliad | P. aeruginosa, Due south. pyogenes (BC, WS), K. oxytoca, MSSA (WS), Bacteroides fragilis (abscess drainage) | seven | Traditional Samoan tattooing under unhygienic weather condition | Hospitalization, fully recovered after 9 weeks | Korman et al. (1997) (12) |
| Pustular lesions | Acute spinal epidural abscess with lower limb weakness | 1, United States of America | 25, f | MSSA (WS, abscess drainage) | seven | NA | Hospitalization, fully recovered later 8 weeks | Chowfin et al. (1999) (thirteen) |
| Endocarditis (bicuspid aortic valve) | 1, United Kingdom | 28, m | S. aureus (BC, explanted aortic valve) | 7 | NA | Hospitalization, fully recovered afterward xvi weeks | Satchithananda et al. (2001) (xiv) | |
| Cellulitis | Septic shock | 2, New Zealand | 45, m | S. aureus, S. pyogenes, P. aeruginosa (WS) | 2 | Traditional Samoan tattooing under unhygienic conditions | Hospitalization, fully recovered after iv weeks | Porter et al. (2005) (15) |
| Necrotizing fasciitis | Septic shock, abdominal compartment syndrome, acute centre failure | 29, k | S. pyogenes, S. aureus (WS), Corynebacterium spp., K. oxytoca (soft tissue debridement) | 2 | Traditional Samoan tattooing, utilise of non-sterile equipment, highly contaminated ink and yellow paint (aerobic spore-forming bacilli) | Hospitalization, expiry | ||
| Cellulitis, pustules, abscesses | Bacteremia (4/34 cases) (no underlying diseases except for one patient with hepatitis C) | 34, United States of America | 15–42, 73% k | MRSA (WS) | iv–22 | Employ of not-sterile equipment and suboptimal infection-command practices (unlicensed tattooists) | Hospitalization (4/34 cases) | CDC (2006) (16) |
| Local skin infection | Endocarditis (bicuspid aortic valve) | one, Britain | 44, chiliad | S. lugdunensis (BC) | NA | NA | Hospitalization, full recovery | Tse et al. (2009) (18) |
| Erythema | Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis | 1, United states of America | 16, m | MRSA (renal tissue) | <21 | Unsterile tattooing | Hospitalization, fully recovered after 4 weeks | Chalmers et al. (2010) (20) |
| Endocarditis | i, Argentina | 34, f | Moraxella lacunata (BC) | four | NA | Hospitalization, fully recovered afterward eight weeks | Callejo et al. (2010) (19) | |
| Extensive cellulitis | Septic shock leading to acute renal failure | 2, New Zealand | 23, 1000 | South. aureus and group C streptococci (WS) | 3 | Traditional Samoan tattooing under unhygienic conditions | Hospitalization, full recovery after 6 weeks but ongoing wound direction required | McLean and D'Souza (2011) (21) |
| Severe cellulitis, necrotizing fasciitis | Septic shock leading to multi-organ failure | 25, k | S. pyogenes, P. aeruginosa (WS) | two | Traditional Samoan tattooing nether unhygienic weather condition | Hospitalization, full recovery after 6 weeks but ongoing wound management required | ||
| Deep pare infection, multiple abscesses | Sepsis | 1, Usa of America | 46, one thousand | Group A streptococci and MSSA (BC) | <v | Traditional Samoan tattooing | Hospitalization, fully recovered later half-dozen weeks | Elegino-Steffens et al. (2013) (27) |
| Tropical pyomyositis | one, Cuba | 19, f | S. aureus (WS) | xv | Not-professional tattooing nether unhygienic conditions | Consummate recovery after iv weeks | Báez Sarría et al. (2013) (26) | |
| Superficial skin infection | Iliopsoas abscess | 2, U.s.a. of America | Adult, m | MRSA | NA | Sharing the same ink and equipment with his wife | Hospitalization | Gulati et al. (2014) (31) |
| Iliopsoas abscess (intravenous drug abuse, hepatitis C) | 48, f | MRSA (BC) | NA | Non-professional person home-made tattoo under unhygienic conditions or potential ink contamination | Hospitalization, fully recovered | |||
| Endocarditis (myxoid degeneration of the mitral valve), septic emboli (knee, brain, lung) | 1, The states of America | 23, m | MSSA (BC) | ane–2 | NA | Hospitalization, fully recovered after half-dozen weeks | Akkus et al. (2014) (28) | |
| Abscess | Peripheral septic thrombophlebitis; necrotizing pneumonia (intravenous drug abuse in medical history) | 1, United states of America | 28, yard | MRSA (WS, abscess drainage, BC, sputum) | 7 | NA | Hospitalization, fully recovered afterwards six weeks | Rabbani and Sharma(2014) (33) |
| Sepsis, septic emboli (musculus and joints) | 1, United States of America | 18, grand | Haemophilus influenzae (BC) | 14 | NA | Hospitalization, fully recovered subsequently 2 weeks | Kaldas et al. (2014) (29) | |
| Sepsis, endocarditis, pulmonary emboli (open valvotomy for congenital aortic stenosis at the age of xviii months followed by Ross procedure) | i, United Kingdom | twenty, m | MSSA (BC, excised pulmonary homograft tissue) | 28 | Tattooing under unhygienic weather | Hospitalization, recovered afterwards viii weeks | Orton et al. (2014) (32) | |
| Erythematous rash and multiple papules | Toxic shock syndrome | 1, South korea | 26, m | MSSA (WS) | three | NA | Hospitalization, fully recovered after ii–3 weeks | Jeong et al. (2015) (35) |
Bacteriological contamination of tattoo inks
Since simply seven reports on contaminated tattoo inks have been published so far (Table 2) we officially collected 39 tattoo inks in use during an international tattoo convention in Germany, 2014, and determined their microbial status to specify the risk of infection associated with the subepidermal application of ink deposits. A full of nineteen inks (49%) were claimed to be sterile/sterilized on the label. Fifteen (38%) contained benzisothiazolinone as a preservative, iii additionally contained methylisothiazolinone and phenoxyethanol. Twenty-iii products used alcohol as a solvent, in most cases isopropyl alcohol. Among the 39 colorants investigated, two (5%) were contaminated with aerobic mesophilic bacteria (˜107 leaner per gram of ink). Both products were free of preservatives. In one sample various Pseudomonas species (P. pseudoalcaligenes, P. stutzeri, P. fluorescens group) and Delftia spp. (D. lacustris/tsuruhatensis group) were detected. The other sample was contaminated with P. aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Agrobacterium tumefaciens/Rhizobium sp. and bacteria belonging to the Staphylococcus warneri/pasteuri group. The bacterial genera identified were largely in line with those described in the literature (Table 2).
Tabular array two
Bacterial contamination of tattoo inks
| Reference | Full number of tested inks (opened/ unopened) | Number (percentage) of contaminated samples | Bacterial load [cfu/g] (samples) | Organisms identified | |
| Total | Opened, Unopened | ||||
| Reus and van Buuren (2001) (e5) | 63 (32/31) | 11 (eighteen) | 8(25), 3 (10) | xiv–ten5 (1), > xfive (7) 10ii –tenfour (iii) | Pseudomonas aeruginosa, P. putida, P. fluorescens |
| Charnock (2004) (e6) | 12 (10/2) | 7 (58) | half dozen (sixty), 1 (l) | x2–103 (2), 10six–ten9 (4) 102 –10iii (i) | Gram-positive, aerobic rods, Citrobacter freundii, Achromobacter xylosoxidans, A. denitrificans, Corynebacterium sp., Brevundimonas diminuta, P. aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Leuconostoc spp., Methylobacterium mesophilicum |
| Droß and Mildau (2007) (e7) | 245 (mainly opened) | 26 (11) | 102–107 (26) | Pseudomonas spp., Citrobacter spp., aerobic spore-forming bacteria, Ralstonia pickettii, coliform bacteria | |
| Baumgartner and Gautsch (2011) (e8) | 145 (106/39) | 41 (28) | 27 (26), 14 (36) | < 10ane (5), 101–10three (18), 103–10eight (4) < 101 (7), 10one –103 (7) | Enterococcus spp., Micrococcus spp., Staphylococcus spp., Brevundimonas vesicularis, P. fluorescens, S. maltophilia, Bacillus spp., Geobacillus spp., Paenibacillus spp., Virgibacillus pantothenticus, Brevibacillus laterosporus |
| Kluger et al. (2011) (e9) | 16 (16/0) | 0 (0) | – | – | – |
| Høgsberg et al. (2013) (e10) | 64 (6/58) | vii (11) | i (17), half dozen (10) | 10ii (1) 102 –x3 (6) | Streptococcus spp., Acinetobacter sp., Bacillus sp., Staphylococcus sp., Aeromonas sobria, Acidovorax, Pseudomonas sp., Dietzia maris, Blastomonas sp., Enterococcus faecium |
| Bonadonna et al. (2014) (e11) | 34 (27/7) | 29 (85) | 23 (85), half dozen (86) | < 101 (11), ten1–103 (12) < 10ane (4), < 102 (2) | Bacillus spp., Staphylococcus spp., Enterobacter intermedius, Cronobacter sakazakii, Sphingomonas paucimobilis |
cfu, colony forming unit
Discussion
Infectious complications from tattoos include superficial infections such every bit impetigo, deep bacterial pare infections presenting equally erysipelas or cellulitis and systemic infections which may lead, in very rare cases, to life-threatening complications due to endocarditis, septic shock, and multi-organ failure (38). Acute pyogenic skin infections or bacteremia usually occur within a few days after placement of the tattoo and predominantly involve methicillin-resistant Due south. aureus (MRSA) or methicillin-sensitive Due south. aureus (MSSA), Streptococcus spp., and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) skin infections
In recent years, a considerable number of reports describing cases of nontuberculous mycobacterial infections following tattooings have been published (9, ten). Conaglen et al. identified a total of 25 reports describing 71 confirmed and 71 likely tattoo-related infections with NTM such equally Yard. chelonae, Thou. haemophilum, and M. abscessus (10). NTM infections typically occurred in healthy individuals inside weeks to months after tattooing and manifested as localized cutaneous infections presenting as papules, pustules and nodules at the site of the tattoo. Often, lesions were restricted to a single colored part of the tattoo. The nigh frequently postulated route of transmission was the dilution of tattoo ink with non-sterile h2o. With several months of antibiotic handling (either clarithromycin alone or in combination with quinolones) outcomes of these long-lasting infections tended to exist good.
Other bacterial infectious complications
Seven cases followed traditional Samoan tattooing in previously healthy, young men from New Zealand, Commonwealth of australia and the USA (12, xv, 21, 23, 24, 27). Typically, patients initially developed erysipelas, multiple subcutaneous abscesses and necrotizing soft tissue infections localized in the tattooed pare expanse which led to severe polymicrobial septicemia, septic shock and life-threatening organ failure. In ane of these cases, cutaneous diphtheria caused by a toxigenic strain of Corynebacterium diphtheriae (var. gravis) has been reported (23, 24). Nonetheless, information technology could well exist that Due south. aureus was the primary pathogen in this case.
1 patient died of acute heart failure as a consequence of septic shock following a ritual Samoan tattooing (xv). In this case, the used ink and a natural yellowish paint (turmeric) showed high contamination with Gram-positive bacteria. Most patients recovered only required prolonged hospitalization with intravenous antibiotic treatment. Inadequate cleaning and sterilization of tattoo equipment also as inappropriate infection command measures and the more invasive procedures were supposed to be the main chance factors of traditional tattooing.
The Centers for Affliction Control and Prevention (CDC) have documented a serial of 34 cases of MRSA infections amongst recipients of tattoos from thirteen unlicensed tattooists in the USA in 2004–2005 (16). The majority of patients were white males without underlying diseases or chance factors. Most infections were mild to moderate (erysipelas, bacterial pustules, and abscesses) and wound healing could be improved with surgical drainage and/or oral antibiotics. Four patients developed bacteremia and required hospitalization for intravenous vancomycin treatment. Suboptimal infection control procedures of unlicensed tattooists were identified as the major risk factor.
Like outcomes and gamble factors for three cases of tattoo-associated S. aureus infections were described in a contempo report (22). In at least one of the cases ink contamination may have caused the infection, since the distribution of the infectious lesions was linked to a single color. Two outbreaks of community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) and Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (PVL)-positive MSSA skin and soft tissue infections at a correctional facility in the USA and in a prison in French republic take been attributed to unhygienic tattooing conditions (17, xxx).
Rare complications of tattoo-related infections caused by Southward. aureus are the toxic stupor syndrome (TSS) caused by toxigenic strains of S. aureus (35) and the staphylococcal scalded pare syndrome (SSSS) (37).
5 cases of presumably tattoo-related infective endocarditis were plant in the literature. Prior center disease was noticed equally a risk factor in four of them. Etiologic agents were human commensals such as Southward. aureus (fourteen, 28), S. lugdunensis (xviii), and Moraxella lacunata (19). Typically, symptoms started inside a week after tattoo placement with recurring episodes of high fever and dyspnea.
Tattoos are more often than not accustomed to be an initial entrance door for leaner into the human body, but the clinical pictures of possible tattoo-related infectious diseases can be more heterogeneous and the etiologic agents more diverse than actually expected (Table 1, eTable).
Contamination of tattoo inks as a potential source of infection
Although almost licensed tattoo parlors accept implemented hygiene measures, bacterial infections emerge. Inappropriate infection control is often blamed to be responsible for tattoo-related infections. Pathogens may originate from surfaces in the tattoo studio environment and from inadequately sterilized instruments or other equipment, or from the commensal or transient skin flora of the tattooed person and the tattooist akin. Tattoo wounds may also become infected during the healing process due to inadequate wound intendance or personal hygiene. In add-on, the applied colorant itself might take gotten extrinsically contaminated during usage or intrinsically during production. Published bacteriological surveys (e5– e11) bear witness that opened (used) as well as unopened (unused) tattoo ink bottles frequently contain considerable numbers of bacteria indicating that the manufactured tattoo product itself may exist a risk factor in tattoo-related infections (Table ii). Contamination rates beyond 10% are not unusual for tattoo inks. In general, lower bacterial counts of bacilli or other spore-forming leaner are found in unopened ink containers (102–103 colony forming units per gram ink [cfu/1000]), whereas high bacterial loads are common for opened bottles (103–109 cfu/yard). From opened bottles, Gram-negative aerobic bacteria such as P. aeruginosa were isolated in high numbers (e6). These ubiquitous germs (?) are able to colonize nearly all environments including soil, tap and marine waters, as well as the homo peel. Yet Gram-positive leaner such as Staphylococcus spp. that are function of the commensal flora of the human pare can also be found in opened every bit well as unopened bottles (e8). Most of the bacterial contaminants were non highly virulent though, just instead opportunistic pathogens (e5– e11).
Many of the bacterial genera that take been associated with tattoo-related infections are in accord with those found in bacteriological surveys of opened tattoo ink bottles (see Tables 1 and 2, eTable). Bottling of ink solutions from stock bottles to smaller not-sterile cups recurrently contaminated during the placement of a tattoo represents only one but certainly a highly likely source of contagion, in particular, when the pinnacle of the stock canteen repeatedly gets into contact with the cup. Another common source is the mixing of colors and dilution of inks by the tattoo creative person nether non-sterile weather or with non-sterile diluents (e.g., tap water or "distilled", only non germ-gratuitous h2o). As a consequence, bacteria may readily achieve infective doses (>10three to 108 cfu/g, see Table 2) in tattoo products, especially when they are inadequately preserved (e6, e8, e10). Hence, tattoo inks may be underrated equally a potential source of bacterial infection and harmonized legal requirements for tattooing services as well as mandatory quality measures are needed not only for tattoo parlors but besides for producers of tattoo inks (come across eBox 2 on regulatory aspects).
Conclusions
With respect to the considerable popularity of tattoos and yet bereft regulation of hygiene measures in both the production of tattoo inks and the process of tattooing, infection risks associated to this kind of trunk art should be recognized as a potential public health business organization (2, 3, 8, 38). Since consumers may not be aware of infection risks from tattooing and tattoo artists complying with hygiene guidelines cannot easily be identified, statutory rules are urgently needed for consumer protection. Physicians should be aware of the tattoo-related complications, educate patients about potential wellness risks and provide communication to those with predisposing weather condition regarding the need of preventive measures such as specific follow-up care. If indicated patients shall be asked to refrain from tattoos which may help to foreclose sequelae.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest argument
Prof. Al Dahouk has written a medical expertise written report regarding this paper'due south field of study affair.
All other authors declare that no conflict of involvement exists.
Acknowledgments
This study has been financially supported by intramural grants of the German Federal Found for Risk Assessment (BfR).
References
1. Kluger N. Epidemiology of tattoos in industrialized countries. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2015;48:6–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
ii. Laux P, Tralau T, Tentschert J, et al. A medical-toxicological view of tattooing. Lancet. 2016;387:395–402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Klügl I, Hiller KA, Landthaler M, Bäumler W. Incidence of wellness problems associated with tattooed skin: a nation-broad survey in German language-speaking countries. Dermatology. 2010;221:43–fifty. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Kazandjieva J, Tsankov Northward. Tattoos: dermatological complications. Clin Dermatol. 2007;25:375–382. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Kluger N. Self-reported tattoo reactions in a accomplice of 448 French tattooists. Int J Dermatol. 2015;55:764–768. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
half-dozen. Liszewski W, Kream E, Helland S, Cavigli A, Lavin BC, Murina A. The demographics and rates of tattoo complications, regret, and unsafe tattooing practices: a cantankerous-sectional study. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41:1283–1289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Schmidt A. Hygiene standards for tattooists. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2015;48:223–227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
viii. Wenzel SM, Rittmann I, Landthaler 1000, Bäumler West. Agin reactions afterward tattooing: review of the literature and comparing to results of a survey. Dermatology. 2013;226:138–147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Mudedla S, Avendano EE, Raman G. Not-tuberculous mycobacterium skin infections after tattooing in healthy individuals: a systematic review of case reports. Dermatol Online J. 2015;21(half-dozen.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
ten. Conaglen PD, Laurenson IF, Sergeant A, Thorn SN, Rayner A, Stevenson J. Systematic review of tattoo-associated peel infection with rapidly growing mycobacteria and public health investigation of a cluster in Scotland, 2010. Eurosurveillance. 2013 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Mathur DR, Sahoo A. Pseudomonas septicemia following tribal tatoo marks. Trop Geogr Med. 1984;36:301–302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Korman TM, Grayson ML, Turnidge JD. Polymicrobial septicaemia with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Streptococcus pyogenes following traditional tattooing. J Infect. 1997;35 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Chowfin A, Potti A, Paul A, Carson P. Spinal epidural abscess after tattooing. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;29:225–226. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Satchithananda DK, Walsh J, Schofield PM. Bacterial endocarditis following repeated tattooing. Heart. 2001;85:11–12. [PMC complimentary commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Porter CJW, Simcock JW, MacKinnon CA. Necrotising fasciitis and cellulitis after traditional Samoan tattooing: case reports. J Infect. 2005;fifty:149–152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus peel infections among tattoo recipients— Ohio, Kentucky, and Vermont, 2004-2005. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55:677–679. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Stemper ME, Brady JM, Qutaishat SS, et al. Shift in Staphylococcus aureus clone linked to an infected tattoo. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:1444–1446. [PMC gratuitous article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Tse D, Khan S, Clarke S. Bacterial endocarditis complicating trunk art. Int J Cardiol. 2009;133:e28–e29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Callejo RM, Nacinovich F, Prieto MA, et al. Moraxella lacunata infective endocarditis after tattooing equally confirmed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing from heart valve tissue. Clin Microbiol Newsl. 2010;32:half dozen–7. [Google Scholar]
xx. Chalmers D, Marietti S, Kim C. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis in an adolescent. Urology. 2010;76:1472–1474. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. McLean Thou, D'Souza A. Life-threatening cellulitis afterwards traditional Samoan tattooing. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2011;35:27–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Coulson A. Illegal tattoos complicated by Staphylococcus infections: a N Carolina wound care and medical center experience. Wounds. 2012;24:323–326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Sears A, McLean K, Hingston D, Eddie B, Short P, Jones Thousand. Cases of cutaneous diphtheria in New Zealand: implications for surveillance and direction. Due north Z Med J. 2012;125:64–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. McGouran DC, Ng SK, Jones MR, Hingston D. A case of cutaneous diphtheria in New Zealand. North Z Med J. 2012;125:93–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Wollina U. Astringent adverse events related to tattooing: a retrospective analysis of 11 years. Indian J Dermatol. 2012;57:439–443. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Báez Sarría F, Rodríguez Collar TL, Santos VF. Tropical pyomyositis as a complication of a tattoo. Rev Cubana Med Mil. 2013;42:417–422. [Google Scholar]
27. Elegino-Steffens DU, Layman C, Bacomo F, Hsue Grand. A case of severe septicemia following traditional Samoan tattooing. Hawaii J Med Public Wellness. 2013;72:5–ix. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Akkus NI, Mina GS, Fereidoon South, Rajpal S. Tattooing complicated by multivalvular bacterial endocarditis. Herz. 2014;39:349–351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. Kaldas 5, Katta P, Trifinova I, Marino C, Sitnitskaya Y, Khanna S. Rare tattoo complication: Haemophilus influenzae sepsis in a teenager. Consultant. 2014;54:289–291. [Google Scholar]
xxx. Bourigault C, Corvec Southward, Brulet V, et al. Outbreak of skin infections due to panton-valentine leukocidin-positive methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in a French prison in 2010-2011. PLoS Curr. 2014 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Gulati S, Jain A, Sattari Thou. Tattooing: a potential novel hazard factor for iliopsoas abscess. World J Clin Cases. 2014;two:459–462. [PMC complimentary commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Orton CM, Norrington G, Alam H, Alonso-Gonzalez R, Gatzoulis 1000. The danger of wearing your heart on your sleeve. Int J Cardiol. 2014;175:e6–e7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33. Rabbani S, Sharma TR. MRSA necrotizing pneumonia and peripheral septic thrombophlebitis. Consultant. 2014 [Google Scholar]
34. Diranzo García J, Villodre Jiménez J, Zarzuela Sánchez V, Castillo Ruiperez L, Bru Pomer A. Skin abscess due to Serratia marcescens in an immunocompetent patient afterward receiving a tattoo. Example Rep Infect Dis 2015; 2015 626917. [PMC gratuitous commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Jeong KY, Kim KS, Suh GJ, Kwon WY. Toxic daze syndrome following tattooing. Korean J Crit Care Med. 2015;30:184–190. [Google Scholar]
36. Maloberti A, Betelli 1000, Perego MR, Foresti S, Scarabelli 1000, Grassi G. A case of Pseudomonas aeruginosa commercial tattoo infection. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Epub ahead of print. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37. Mikkelsen CS, Holmgren Hr, Arvesen KB, Jarjis RD, Gunnarsson GL. Severe scratcher-reaction: an unknown health hazard? Dermatology Reports. 2015;7:9–11. [PMC gratuitous article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38. Serup J, Hutton Carlsen G, Sepehri M. Tattoo complaints and complications: diagnosis and clinical spectrum. Curr Probl Dermatol: S. Karger AG. 2015:48–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
E1. Frew JW, Nguyen RT. Tattoo-associated mycobacterial infections: an emerging public health issue. Med J Aust. 2015;203 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
E2. Philips RC, Hunter-Ellul LA, Martin JE, Wilkerson MG. Mycobacterium fortuitum infection arising in a new tattoo. Dermatol Online J. 2014;20 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
E3. Sousa PP, Cruz RC, Schettini AP, Westphal DC. Mycobacterium abscessus skin infection after tattooing—example written report. An Bras Dermatol. 2015;90:741–743. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
E4. Danford B, Weingartner J, Patel One thousand. Apace growing mycobacterial infection following tattoo. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72 [Google Scholar]
E5. Reus H, van Buuren R. Kleurstoffen voor tatoeage en permanente brand-up. Legislation study no ND COS 012. Inspectorate for Health Protection North, Ministry of Health. 2001:one–36. [Google Scholar]
E6. Charnock C. Colourants used for tattooing contaminated with leaner. Tatoveringsløsninger forurenset av bakterier. 2004;124:933–935. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
E7. Droß A, Mildau G. Mikrobiologischer Status von Mitteln zum Tätowieren Berichte zur Lebensmittelsicherheit 200, Bundesweiter Überwachungsplan 2007. Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit. 2007 [Google Scholar]
E8. Baumgartner A, Gautsch S. Hygienic-microbiological quality of tattoo- and permanent make-upward colours. J Verbrauch Lebensm. 2011;six:319–325. [Google Scholar]
E9. Kluger N, Terru D, Godreuil S. Bacteriological and fungal survey of commercial tattoo inks used in daily practice in a tattoo parlour. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011;25:1230–1231. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
E10. Høgsberg T, Saunte DM, Frimodt-Møller N, Serup J. Microbial status and product labelling of 58 original tattoo inks. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27:73–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
E11. Bonadonna L, Briancesco R, Coccia AM, et al. Valutazione delle caratteristiche microbiologiche di inchiostri per tatuaggi in confezioni integre e dopo l'apertura. Microbiologica Medica. 2014;29 [Google Scholar]
E12. Council of Europe Resolution ResAP(2003)two on tattoos and permanent make-up. Strasbourg, France, Quango of Europe. 2003 [Google Scholar]
E13. Quango of Europe Resolution ResAP(2008)1 on requirements and criteria for the rubber of tattoos and permanent brand-up (superseding resolution ResAP(2003)2 on tattoos and permanent make-upwards) Strasbourg, France, Council of Europe. 2008 [Google Scholar]
E14. CEN European committee for standardization CEN/TC 435—Project committee tattooing services Prophylactic exercise and hygiene requirements. https://standards.cen.eu/ (concluding accessed 15 August 2016). [Google Scholar]
E15. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health intendance interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ital J Public Health. 2009;six:354–391. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
E16. Vandenbroucke JP. In defense of case reports and example series. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:330–334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Deutsches Ärzteblatt International are provided here courtesy of Deutscher Arzte-Verlag GmbH
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5290255/
Posted by: onealhinsuff.blogspot.com
0 Response to "How Common Is It For A Tattoo To Get Infected"
Post a Comment